SPLIT TEST ACCELERATOR
 













An Ordinary Case Study,
And A Lesson


A friend of mine sold a "How To Stop Snoring" eBook via AdWords. There were only a couple of eBooks in that niche at the time, and he was making about $1500/month profit just advertising with Google Adwords. It was a nice little gig for him that paid his mortgage. It took very little attention, and the  money was dependable for a long time.

Then one day there was a new "how to stop snoring" book being advertised.  

Then a couple days later another popped up.  

Then another.

It seems one of those membership sites that creates products for its members created a "how to stop snoring" product, and several of their members entered the market at the same time.

This did two things:

First, it affected my friend's conversion rate.  He went from converting 2.5% of visitors to a little under 1%.  It seems that having more options in the market made visitors more choosy (or indecisive), and it was tougher to make the sale.  

Second, it drove up his ad costs.  He had been paying $0.15 for the 2nd or 3rd position, and now he had to pay  $0.34 for that spot.

Before the competition swooped in, my friend was making $1500/month on his little side project, now he was actually losing money on his ads.

You Can't Always Anticipate Changes In Your Market,
But With The Right Resources You Can
Respond To Them With Confidence.

My friend explained his situation to me, and asked me what I would do. I told him he had to try to get his ad costs down and his conversion rate up.

On my recommendation he bought Perry Marshall's Adwords book, and re-worked his adgroups some, and got his ad costs down some.  This allowed him to break even on his advertising.  Still far short of the $1500/month he was used to, but at least he could afford to run his ads and work on the conversion rate.

Then we put the Split Test Accelerator program to work on his landing page.  We brainstormed some factors that might affect his conversion rate.  We tried a single page versus breaking up the page into three parts.  We tried different anchor points for the price, and different prices.  We tried different headlines and backgrounds, and so on.  And within a week we got his conversion rate back to about 1.5%

And this got him back to making about $500/month. We weren't thrilled, but it was better than losing money.

Then something interesting happened over the next few weeks.

Some of the new competitors started dropping out.  This lowered his ad costs, and caused his conversion rates to go up again.

Today he converts about 2% of his visitors, and pays about $0.18/click for his favorite ad location.   And he's making about $1,000/month again, still with very little ongoing effort.

It's not quite the $1500/month he was making, but there are still more competitors today than there were.

Many marketers would have given up the niche, but my friend made changes, and is still going strong with his little extra income generator.

Marketers commit many sins, but . . .

The Unpardonable Sin
In Marketing Is Failure To Adapt

One lesson from the story is that the Split Test Accelerator can help you adapt quickly to new market conditions.

But another lesson is that the Split Test Accelerator is not a magic bullet.  It won't solve all your ills.  We got a 60% improvement on my friend's landing page, and that helped revive his project, but we still didn't get it back to the 2.5% conversion rate he had before.

Part of the reason might be that we didn't brainstorm well enough.  Perhaps we could still get a higher conversion rate if we had better ideas.

But the main reason my friend's sales didn't rebound 100% is that working on your conversion rate is just one piece of the puzzle. It's a very important piece.  But it's just one piece.

There are other pieces.

For instance, the market conditions are at least as important as the factors on your sales page.  It's just tougher to sell a "how to stop snoring" book via Adwords now than it was before.

The market conditions changed, and that's a fact.

As you read the rest of this letter . . . if you are considering using STA . . . it's important that you keep the following in mind:
  • If the market doesn't want your product, there might not be much you can do about it. If you could double your conversion rate and still not make a profit, don't purchase STA at this time. You probably need to find a different product or a different market instead.

    However, . . .
  • If you have a landing page that's already profitable in the market, STA can definitely help you make it much more profitable.
  • If you have a landing page that's close to profitable, STA can help you make your first profits.
  • And if you have a landing page that WAS profitable, and something bad happens, STA might just keep you in business.

"Here's A Really Simple Explanation
Of How Accelerated Split Testing
Can Make You More Sales."

(OR "How To Find All The Needles
In Your Haystack In One Shot.")

If you want more sales from your landing page, you will have make some changes to your landing page.

For instance, maybe you would sell more copies of your product if you used a different headline. Or if you used a video. Or if you put the testimonials at the top of the page instead of at the bottom. Or if you led with a picture of someone using your product. Or if you used one of those cool peel away ads. Or if you used a drop cap. Or if you had more order links. Or if you broke your sales page into multiple parts. Or if you had information running down the side of the page in addition to the main text. Or if you framed the price in a different way. Or . . .

Those are all interesting ideas. And some of them might work. But here's the thing . . . even if you generate a whole bunch of testing ideas, you probably won't know which ideas will make a positive difference, and which ones won't.

In fact, most of your ideas will NOT be good ideas. That is, they won't lead to any kind of significant improvement. (This is true even for very good professional marketers and copywriters).

Charles Holland, author of "Breakthrough Business Results With MVT", argues that out of every 100 ideas people have for improving business processes, only about 6 of them will be test-worthy and turn out to make a significant positive difference.

(Here's the breakdown:  Of 100 ideas, you will probably test only about 25, because the others are too expensive, time-consuming or impractical to test. Of the 25 you test, about 13 won't make any real difference, 6 will HURT, and 6 will lead to significant improvement.)

Now here's the thing. Those 6 ideas might double or triple your conversion rate!

But since you don't know which ideas are good, and which aren't, that makes the task before you a lot like . . .

. . . looking for needles in a haystack.

The needles are the few good ideas that will increase your conversion rate 20%, 50%, 100% or more. The strands of straw are all the other ideas that will either hurt your conversion rate, won't be tested, or won't make much difference.

And when all the ideas are stacked up together, you can't tell which ideas are the 6 good ideas, and which are the 94 useless ones.

That's why split testing each idea . . . one at a time . . . is kind of like . . .

. . . looking for needles in a haystack, one needle-shaped thingy at a time.

But using the Split Test Accelerator software and methods is kind of like putting that haystack of ideas on a magnetized hay sifter , and . . .

. . . giving it a good shake.

And . . .

voilà!


You find what you were looking for often 10 times faster than you would with ordinary split testing.

In this case, you were looking for those few changes to your sales page that will deliver a powerful boost to your conversion rate.

Now which would you rather do? Take a week (or a month) and test just one straw-shaped thingy, hoping it's a needle, and then discover that it's a worthless piece of straw? (This often happens 3, 4, or 5 times in a row with traditional A/B split testing.)

Or would you rather shake the heck out of the entire haystack, and quickly get good results almost every single time?


"When You Shake The Whole Haystack,
You Can Get Breakthrough Results
And Create Large Increases In Your Profits."

I have used the Split Test Accelerator on my own landing pages and those of friends. And here are some of the results:

  • 75% improvement in sales from a landing page for a low carb diet book.
  • 200%+ improvement in click throughs for a Google Adwords ad (I used a spreadsheet for this test)
  • 40% improvement for a low carb newsletter opt-in page.
  • 100% improvement in sales for a site selling pinewood derby cars.
  • an additional 70% improvement on the same pinewood derby car site.
  • 60% improvement on a Stop Snoring ebook site.
  • 47% improvement on my opt-in form for the Split Test Accelerator.
  • 97% improvement in free signups for a membership site.

I wish I had more tests to share, and I'm working on it.  I'll be honest.  I've spent too much time developing the software, and struggling to earn my Ph.D. while raising two beautiful kids to use my own software as much as I wanted to. (That has changed since I finished my degree.  I am doing more testing now, and am starting to offer consulting services as well.)

There are others who have done more accelerated split testing than I have (including many of my customers).

For example, Richard Mouser used STA with some help from David Bullock, and turned around his business. You can read his story in the March, 2007 issue of "Black Enterprise" magazine.

There are also case studies worth reading at www.taguchinow.com, and results-squared.com. For instance, at Taguchinow.com you can read about how Dell Computer used accelerated split testing on an email ad to get the following results:

  • Click Through Rate increase: 5.2 times
  • 7.1 times more sales per mail
  • Annual sales before optimization: $8,900,000
  • Annual sales after optimization: $63,100,000

Accelerated split testing works. Some of the consulting gurus claim to routinely double and triple conversion rates.

But I think you'd have to agree that even the "do it yourself" results I got aren't bad, especially when you consider that profits almost always go up more than the increase in conversion rate.

Here's what's kind of neat:

I Got Pretty Good Results Using
Inferior Brainstorming And Test Design Methods.

When I designed my first tests I was pretty much a marketing neophyte (or "noobie"). I was at best an amateur copywriter and marketer. So I had a lot of weak headlines and bad material in my tests.

Even today it's probably good that you're buying software from me, and not copywriting services :-)

I also had to come up with my own brainstorming method, and honestly many of my ideas and tests were weak and timid.

But it still worked!

Some of my early customers were left to develop their own methods, too, and they got relatively small improvements with their first tests. (And I didn't know how to advise them any better back then).

They still got 10% to 20% improvements, which isn't bad. But those aren't the kind of results that are possible with this method. (I should add that some customers did very well, right out of the blocks, too).

But things are different now. I'm not going to just give you the software and leave you to develop your own methods

Because . . .

I Am Now In A Position To Deliver
Great Software, AND Powerful
Brainstorming And Test Design Methods.

Here's why:

  • In March, 2005 I drove my green 1994 Pontiac Bonneville 857 miles from Seattle to San Francisco to attend a seminar put on by Dr. Jim Kowalick and Mario Fantoni, and I learned many of their methods.

    For what it's worth, it was a beautiful trip.  You're almost always in the shadow of some majestic snow-capped volcano -- From Mount Rainier to Mount St. Helens to Mount Hood to Mount Shasta.  Shasta Lake is wonderful.  Then you get to drive along the fringe of Napa Valley.  And the seminar site at Half Moon Bay was absolutely gorgeous.  And the weather couldn't have been better.  Yes, it was a sacrifice, but it allowed me to learn my craft better, so I made the sacrifice :-)
  • More recently, I discovered Qualpro -- a consulting company that uses multi-variate testing to improve business processes. And I have studied their methods intently.
  • Finally, I took what I believe to be the easiest and best parts of both approaches, modified them in some cases to fit the specific constraints of online landing pages, mixed them with strategies that came from my own testing experience, and put them into a little eBook that will be included with your software.

I call the eBook, "How To Use Accelerated Split Testing To Get More Sales, Opt-ins, And Other Actions From Your Visitors". (It's a mouthful, but it tells you exactly what's in the book!)

And the book comes free with the software. (I'll tell you more about both on the next page).

Now that you know a little about how accelerated split testing works, I want to get into a little more detail, and tell you about the tool that makes it all happen.

And I want to assure you that . . .

"The Split Test Accelerator Is Simple
. . . And Complex . . .
Whichever Appeals To You Most."


I could list a hundred functions that STA performs, and tell you about each one.  I know them all, because I wrote the code.  But that might overwhelm you . . .









Do You Have The Skills And Tools You Need To . . .



. . . take your landing page . . .


A landing page seeking an opt-in to an email list.





. . .identify different elements of the page (up to 20 elements on the same page) that might be improved . . .


Sit down and brainstorm.  Get ideas from other people's landing pages, and use the brainstorming techniques you'll get with STA





. . . create alternatives for those elements . . .


This is the form for one of the factors.  It's just simple cut and paste.





. . . send traffic to your page just as you did before (STA automatically serves your visitors a small carefully selected fraction of the possible combinations) . . .


this test automatically serves just 36 ads, but those carefully selected ads test several options for each of 10 factors that have over 400,000 combinations. Each ad is served roughly an even number of times in a random rotation, and conversion data is tracked.  
But you don't have to worry about the details!  The software does it all for you.



the results from the 36 ads predict what is the best option for each of the 10 factors.




. . . and find a new combination of factors that will make significantly more sales (a combination that probably wasn't even in your test) ? . . .


This landing page converted 47% more visitors than the previous one.  The headline area and the location of the form were the main factors contributing to this result.




. . . You will.
(c) Copyright 2004-2010 by Jim Stone Enterprises. - All Rights Reserved
20027 13th Drive SE Bothell, WA 98012
Disclaimer¦ Contact ¦ Free Adwords Accelerator Spreadsheet ¦ Free Multivariate Testing Course ¦ Free Confidence Measuring tool ¦ Split Test Accelerator ¦ Blog ¦